Washington – According to a person familiar with the case, Purplexity AI has introduced a new proposal for the basic company of the ticket, which will allow the US government to owe up to 50% of a new unit, which is the American Business of Tickets to Perplexity Merge with
The proposal presented last week is the amendment of the former plan that the Artificial Intelligence Start presented the ticket company Bittden on 18 January, which was a day before the law that banned tickets.
The first proposal to which bytedens have not responded to a new structure have been sought to create a new structure that will merge the Perplexity in Francisco with Tikok’s American business and will also include investors’ investment.
The person said, who was not authorized to speak about the proposal, the new proposal would allow the US government to take half of the new structure when it would offer an initial public offering of at least $ 300 billion. The person said that the proposal for perfections was revised based on the response of the Trump administration.
The person said, if the plan is successful, then the government -owned stocks will not have the right to vote. The government will not get a place in the new company board either.
BiteDance and Ticketlock did not immediately respond to the remarks request.
Under the scheme, Bitdens will not have to break ties with tickets, which is a favorable result for its investors. But he would have to allow “full American board control”, the person said.
According to a document viewed by the Associated Press, under the proposal, the China -based tech company will contribute to the American business without tickets without the ownership algorithm, which promotes users to look at the app.
This proposal seems to reflect the strategy that Treasury Secretary Steven Manuchin discussed the Sunday Morning Fucers of Fox News on Sunday during Trump’s first term – that a new investor in tickets was easily “low” Can do and satisfy the law. Mnuchin has earlier expressed interest in investing in the company.
“But technology needs to be separated from China,” he said. “It needs to be separated from Bittens. It is not at all that China will ever let us do something like this in China. ‘
The proposal for perfection has come when many investors are expressing interest in tickets. President Donald Trump said late Saturday that he hoped that an agreement would be reached within 30 days.
In a flight from Las Vegas to Las Vegas on Air Force One, Trump also said that he did not discuss any agreement with Software Manufacturer Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, despite a report that Oracle, with outside investors, with outdoor investors Considering global acquisition. Operation.
“Many people are talking to me. Very good people, “said Trump. “We are very interested in it, and the United States will be a big beneficiary. … I will do this only when the United States will benefit. ”
Under a bipartisan law passed last year, tickets were to be banned in the United States until 19 January, if he did not break the relationship with Bittens. The Supreme Court upheld the law, but Trump issued an executive order to prevent the implementation of the law for 75 days.
On Air Force One, Trump said that Alison stays “just below the road” from his Mar-e-Lago Estate, but he said, “I never talked to Larry about ticket. Talked to and is very interested in tickets.
The ticket had stopped for some time in the US a week ago, but after Trump said that he would postpone the ban, again online. Trump tried unsuccessfully to ban the US on the platform during his first term. But since then he has changed his position and has credited this platform to help more young voters win during last year’s presidential election.
Ticketkeep CEO Shaw Chu attended Trump’s inauguration ceremony on January 20 along with some other technical leaders who are having friendly relations with the new administration.
The Congress voted for a ban on tickets in the US due to the concern that the ownership structure of the ticket represents a security risk. The Biden administration argued in the court for months that a Chinese company allowed to allow the algorithm to control the algorithm that people appear on the app. Authorities also expressed concern about the user data collected on the platform.
However, till date, the US has not provided public evidence to hand over the user data to Chinese authorities or allow them to tamper with their algorithms.