Washington – President Donald Trump has surfaced after returning to the White House less than three weeks ago: he makes a cruel proposal, his opponents filed a lawsuit and a federal judge holds the plan.
This has happened with Trump’s efforts to free some federal funding, reduce congenital citizenship and exclude government employees.
Now the question is whether the court’s decisions are the only speed bump or an impossible roadblock for the Republican President, which are firm to expand the limits of their power – sometimes by ignoring only laws.
Although Democrats can be encouraged from the early stages of judicial resistance, the legal battle is only starting. Cases arising in more liberal courts like Boston, Seattle and Washington, DC can find their way in the US Supreme Court, where a orthodox majority have demonstrated their desire to reverse the example.
“Constitutional or not only the latest court verdict is good as a constitutional or not the latest court verdict,” said Professor of Maryland Public Policy.
Broadly three dozens of cases have already been filed, including the FBI agents, who are afraid that they are being purified for political reasons and families that are being purified for new borders on healthcare for transgender youth. Are worried about.
Spotlight on the judiciary is bright as the Republican-controlled Congress has compulsorily terminated its role of serving as a check in the presidency. Trump’s party MPs have accused their demands of unilateral cuts without proper information and their demands to cut the government’s watchdog.
It only leaves the courts as a possible railing on the President’s ambitions.
Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School, said, “We are below the government’s two branches.”
The latest failures for Trump came on Thursday.
In Seattle, US District Judge John Kafenor blocked Trump’s executive order on congenital citizenship, which was aimed at stopping the children of parents who illegally considering illegal Americans in the country Are.
Coughenour described congenital citizenship, which was established by the 14th amendment, as “a fundamental constitutional right” and he attacked Trump in scary words.
The judge nominated by President Ronald Reagan in 1981 said, “The rule of law, according to him, is to navigate or simply to ignore, whether it is for political or personal gain.”
“There are moments in the history of the world where people look back and ask,” Where were the lawyers? Where were the judges? “Kafenor said.” In these moments, the rule of law becomes especially weak. I am especially weak. Today I refuse to let that beak be dark.
The judge first ordered the order “clearly unconstitutional” while issuing a temporary decision.
“I have been on the bench for four decades,” Kafenor then said. “I could not miss another case where the question presented was clear that it is one.”
In addition, on Thursday, in Boston, US District Judge George O’Tole Jr. stopped Trump’s plan to encourage the federal workers to resign by offering a holiday paid.
In 1995, O’Tole, who was nominated by President Bill Clinton, did not express an opinion on the resignation program, which is commonly described as a purchase. He set a hearing for Monday afternoon to consider the argument.
“We believe that the program violates the law, and we will continue to aggressively defend the rights of our members,” the American Federation of Government Employment National President Avret Kelly said in a statement.
The White House said that at least 40,000 federal workers have already agreed to leave in exchange for payment by 30 September.
Karolin Levitt, secretary of the White House press, said, “We are grateful to the judge to expand the deadline so that more federal workers who refuse to show in the office in a statement.
It is not clear which legal battle will reach the US Supreme Court, where Justice can choose which cases to consider. But Trump has nominated three of the nine members, and the court has taken a comprehensive view of President Shakti.
In a case involving criminal allegations against Trump, Justice ruled that the President is immune from the prosecution of any official action taken during his tenure.
One of some liberal justice on the bench, Sonia Sotomore said that this decision would make the US President “a king above the law”.
Steve Vladek, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, said the courts are pushing back to Trump in their second term. But he warned that there is a need to implement judicial decisions.
Vladek said, “The collapse of pushbacks of any Congress, the responsibility of any Congress, I think what will happen if this administration starts openly defying the court orders, there is an inauspicious sign for it.”
Historically, it will be a political non-starter and will leave a President weak for impeachment. But Trump was acquitted by the American Senate despite two House impeachment from his first term, and then re -chosen by the US voters, making him a little scared of punishment.
A closely seen legal issue includes the President’s ability to withdraw money -authorized money, known as a practice. Although it is banned by the law passed in 1974, after scams involving former President Richard Nixon, some of Trump’s colleagues described the law as an unconstitutional boundary on the White House Authority.
The concept was tested by Trump when the management and the budget office decided to freeze the federal grants and loans, while the administration reviewed the expenditure.
The instructions were blocked by American District Judge Lauren Alkhan, nominated by the President Joe Biden in 2023.
“The action of the defendants in this case is potentially intervening in the appropriation of the Congress’s federal funds and roughly runs on the ‘one bull of the Constitution’,” Alikhan wrote.