Refine funds on American foreign aid and other grants send funds and non -profit scratching

New York – Freezing Foreign Aid. The Paris out of the climate agreement. Restricting non -profit institutions that receive foreign aid by providing us abortion.

Then Monday, the new Trump administration announced a freeze on all federal loans and grants, although that stagnation has been canceled.

Non -profit institutions of all sizes are now struggling with how these changes will affect their mission – anything with the US government taking steps to change a very small portion of funding.

The US government is the largest single global humanitarian funder, giving $ 13.9 billion in 2024, and is the largest supporter of the United Nations agencies, which means that any change in foreign aid has a widespread impact on geographical and issues. The state department and American agency for international development are the main agencies that oversee foreign aid, which Trump reviewed to stay for 90 days reviewed whether each grant and dollars align with their foreign policy.

Yuri Boychco, who established a New Jersey-based non-profit non-profit non-profit non-profit organization for Ukraine, said he woke up to a barrage of messages from ground-level organizations working in Ukraine on Sunday. He feared what would happen if the USAID stops giving the grant there.

He poinned to programs that do not have electricity, especially in rural areas to send firewood trucks. Those who live are often the elderly and poor, they said, and the use of wood both to heat and cook their homes.

“I really don’t know how they are going to get through winter,” he said.

Delivery outfits are mostly volunteers, said Biokocho, and the Kiev does not have the ability to buy wood or fuel required to move it without regular funding from the USAID office. He suggested that anyone who is concerned about money for humanitarian aid in Ukraine calls his representatives or White House.

Read Also:  Democratic states are considering more support for immigrants due to Trump administration's crackdown

“What America made great and what America makes great generosity. And this is not a good step for America, and it is not a good step for humanity as a whole, “he said that Ukraine has really trusted the US to support its support.

The USAID said, “All programs and grants without a discount approved by the Secretary of State have stopped, but not specifically said whether human assistance would be stopped to Ukraine.

In the financial year 2023, available in the most recent figures, $ 68 billion was bound in American foreign aid in American foreign aid in 204 countries and regions for pro -health and democracy initiatives programs.

This is not the first time billionaire philanthropist Mike Bloomberg has stepped up after Trump’s announcement that he is withdrawing from the Landmark Paris Climate Agreement. The former Mayor of New York City pledged on 23 January to fund the US government for the main offices of Climate Change of the United Nations. He also covered the cost of US commitment from 2016 to 2019 in an amount of $ 10.25 million.

Anth Williams said, “Not to change the role of the government, but to be able to take steps to be accelerated, but to show what is possible and when there are no governments, continue to pursue progress For, Bloomberg is really important for philanthropy, “Etha Williams said,” who leads his environmental program.

The United Nations Climate Body was established as part of the historic 2015 Climate Agreement, which aims to keep warming under the pre-industrial levels under 1.5 ° C (2.7 ° F). It conducts annual climate negotiations, where country emissions decrease targets and are committed to climate adaptation and funding of mitigation measures, and track progress towards those goals.

Read Also:  Illinois said with 14 other states that it would protect gender-suit care despite Trump's executive order

Williams said that Bloomberg philanthropy wanted to provide certainty to the United Nations climate change that their budget would be completed.

In addition to the funding of the United Nations Climate Change Secretariat, Bloomberg philanthropists will now continue to support an alliance, named America. It brings together local governments, companies and universities, which reports on progress towards climate goals, which the federal government will stop doing after getting out of the agreement.

Joanna Deplade, a historian at the international climate dialogue, said “is important, as it provides a picture of trends in emissions and therefore moves to progress,” the Paris Agreement goal.

According to lawyers and advisors, according to lawyers and advisors working with foreign aid recipients, communication with USAID and State Department with their grants and contractors has been rare. Publication Devex, which reports on international development, called a webinar of experts on foreign aid on Monday, so that the stop work order, how to manage cash flow, likely to get a discount.

Susan Reichle, a retired senior officer of USAID, said that organizations need to make a case that their work is important not only for the agency, but for American people and Congress.

“Every day what goes by America is not leading its obligations and fulfilling its obligations, whether contractual obligation or cooperative agreement or grant, we are really harming our national security,” He said.

Some organizations are hit by both of them on the order called foreign aid and global GAG rule, which talks as a potential alternative about using American foreign aid by providing abortion services to non -profit organizations Prevents from doing.

Read Also:  CBS News handed over to FCC to hand over the '60 minute' interview with Kamla Harris

The MSI breeding option, an international non -profit that provides reproductive health services, did not sign the rule under the final Trump Administration, meaning that it has not won so much American funding in recent years. Nevertheless, a mobile health clinic that they are run in Zimbabwe are funded through the US Embassy, ​​and Beth Shlachter, senior director of the US external relations, said that the work until no other fund comes forward. Will be closed.

However, he said that no amount of philanthropic funding can make up for the loss or break of American funds, which means that big donors are facing very difficult options.

“Looking at the width of what has happened in the last week, it is not that other donors are only looking at the intervals in reproductive health services. They are looking at the limits of their development concerns, ”he said.

Leave a comment